August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Individual Differences In Obligatory Processing of Unexpected, Intentionally-Ignored Events
Author Affiliations
  • Abigail Noyce
    Department of Psychology, Brandeis University
  • Robert Sekuler
    Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1053. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Abigail Noyce, Robert Sekuler; Individual Differences In Obligatory Processing of Unexpected, Intentionally-Ignored Events. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1053.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The natural environment's predictable structure facilitates various cognitive tasks, from planning motor behaviors to efficiently allocating attention. We set out to study the cognitive and neural impact of unexpected items that subjects are attempting to ignore. To do this, we adapted Eriksen's flanker task to incorporate "standard" and "oddball" distractors. Arrays of five chevrons were briefly presented (50 ms), and subjects reported the orientation of the central target chevron, attempting to ignore the four chevrons that flanked the target. We manipulated the orientation of the distractors, creating standard (90% of trials) and oddball (10%) orientations. Congruent and incongruent configurations, and left- and right-pointing central targets were equiprobable. While subjects performed the task, we recorded scalp EEG signals. EEG measures included the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) elicited by oddball flanker directions, and alpha-band (8-12 Hz) oscillations preceding stimulus onset. Subjects also completed the Adult Temperament Questionnaire, a measure of sensory, emotional, and motor reactivity and control. Behaviorally, oddball flankers substantially enhanced the flanker congruency effect: subjects responded fastest and most accurately on trials with oddball flankers that were congruent with the central target, and slowest and least accurately on trials with oddball flankers that were incongruent. Oddball flankers also elicited a vMMN. Importantly, individual differences in vMMN magnitude were predicted by two factors of temperament: orienting sensitivity and attentional control. Subjects may be using the predictability of the flankers to facilitate intentional ignoring, a strategy that breaks down when confronted with oddballs. Unexpected events are obligatorily processed, even when they occur among distractors. Such events leak through subjects' intentional ignoring, influencing neural responses and behavioral performance.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.