August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Changing how you search alters the influence of memory on attentional allocation and eye movements
Author Affiliations
  • Jordan Grubaugh
    Cognitive Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Mark Mills
    Cognitive Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Brett Bahle
    Cognitive Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Edwin Dalmaijer
    Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University
  • Stefan Van der Stigchel
    Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University
  • Michael Dodd
    Cognitive Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1072. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jordan Grubaugh, Mark Mills, Brett Bahle, Edwin Dalmaijer, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Michael Dodd; Changing how you search alters the influence of memory on attentional allocation and eye movements. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1072.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Previous research has found that inhibition-of-return (IOR) is a task-specific strategy, where participants are significantly slower to return to previously fixated locations in a search task compared to in a non-search task, where facilitation-of-return (FOR) is observed (Dodd et al., 2009). In these contexts, IOR and FOR reflect a differential influence of memory on attention as a function of task demands. Moreover, task set influences the spatial and temporal characteristics of eye movements, such as the rate of change in fixation duration (Mills et al., 2011). In these tasks, search is generally participant-directed, meaning participants have no expectation regarding where the target will appear and can search however they choose. Many real world search tasks, however, are constrained by top-down knowledge regarding a target's expected location, which can be replicated in the laboratory via experimenter-directed search (participants receive explicit direction where to search).. The purpose of the current study was to examine the influence of task set (search, memorize, evaluate) and search type (experimenter-directed vs. participant-directed) on oculomotor behavior. Participants were presented with a series of scenes that pictured common real-world environments (e.g., kitchens) and either a) searched for an embedded N or Z, b) memorized the scene, or c) rated the pleasantness of the scene. Task type could be blocked or mixed and participants were either provided with specific direction as to where targets were likely to appear or were told the target could appear anywhere. Critically, whereas participant-directed search yielded IOR, experimenter-directed search yielded FOR in both mixed and blocked conditions. The rate of change and magnitude of fixation durations was also impacted by search instruction. These results demonstrate an important dissociation between the facilitatory and inhibitory effects of memory on attention and eye movements as a function of search type.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.