August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Dissociating temporal and spatial integration windows: the case of Vernier Fusion
Author Affiliations
  • Jan Drewes
    Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), Trento University, Rovereto, Italy
  • David Melcher
    Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), Trento University, Rovereto, Italy
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1143. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jan Drewes, David Melcher; Dissociating temporal and spatial integration windows: the case of Vernier Fusion. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1143.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The visual system constructs a percept of the world across multiple spatial and temporal scales. This raises the question of whether different scales involve separate integration mechanisms and whether spatial and temporal factors are linked via spatio-temporal reference frames. We investigated this using Vernier Fusion, a phenomenon in which the features of two Vernier stimuli presented in close spatio-temporal proximity are fused into a single percept. With increasing spatial offset, perception changes dramatically from a single percept into apparent motion and later, at larger offsets, into two separately perceived stimuli (Scharnowski et al., 2007). We tested the link between spatial and temporal integration in a study with 21 subjects, consisting of two successive Vernier stimuli presented at varying spatial (0.5-3') and temporal (0-200ms) offsets. The second Vernier either had the same or the opposite offset as the first. We found that the type of percept depended not only on spatial offset, as reported previously, but interacted with the temporal parameter as well. At temporal separations around 30-40ms the majority of trials were perceived as motion, while above 70ms two separate stimuli were reported. The dominance of the second Vernier varied systematically with temporal offset, peaking around 40ms ISI. Same-offset conditions showed increasing amounts of perceived separation at large ISIs, but little dependence on spatial offset. As subjects did not always completely fuse stimuli, we separated trials by reported percept (fusion, motion, separation). We found systematic indications of spatial fusion even on trials in which subjects perceived temporal segregation. These findings imply that spatial integration/fusion may occur even when the stimuli are perceived as temporally separate entities, suggesting that the mechanisms responsible for temporal segregation and spatial integration may not be mutually exclusive.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.