August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Comparing search strategy in breast tomosynthesis and 2D mammogram: an eye tracking study
Author Affiliations
  • Avi Aizenman
    Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Trafton Drew
    Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Dianne Georgian-Smith
    Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Jeremy M. Wolfe
    Brigham and Women's Hospital
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1192. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Avi Aizenman, Trafton Drew, Dianne Georgian-Smith, Jeremy M. Wolfe; Comparing search strategy in breast tomosynthesis and 2D mammogram: an eye tracking study . Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1192.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Breast cancer screening (mammography) has typically involved search of 2D x-rays of the breast. A new modality, breast tomosynthesis (BT) allows visualization of a series of slices through the breast, reducing occlusion from overlapping tissue. BT appears to improve performance but, because it is new, little is known about best search strategies and nothing is known about eye movements during BT search. We compared eye movements for eleven radiologist examining eight BT and and 2D cases. Four cases in each modality contained abnormalities. Each showed only one breast. Observers marked suspicious masses with mouseclicks. Eye-position in X/Y space was recorded at 1000Hz and co-registered with slice/depth plane as radiologists scrolled through BT images, allowing a 3D representation of eye position. As in previous work, BT hit rate for masses was higher than for 2D cases. BT false alarm rate was lower. However, BT search durations were much longer (75s) than 2D (43s). Tomosynthesis produced longer fixations and less distance travelled per unit of time by the eyes. Our lab has shown that, when searching through volumetric images of the chest, radiologists typically adopt one of two distinct strategies. "Drillers" scroll quickly through depth while keeping XY eye position relatively constant. "Scanners" carefully search each XY depth plane before scrolling more slowly in Z (Drew et al., 2013). Mammographers in the current study appear to be predominantly drillers. However, there was some variability in how consistently they used this strategy and how often they made large scanning eye-movements in the XY plane. The current study is a first step towards assessing the effectiveness of different search strategies in tomosynthesis.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.