August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Object location biases shape and color judgments
Author Affiliations
  • Colin Kupitz
    Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University
  • Carina Thiemann
    Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University
  • Julie Golomb
    Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1300. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Colin Kupitz, Carina Thiemann, Julie Golomb; Object location biases shape and color judgments. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1300.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

In our everyday lives, we must coherently bind the features and identities of objects with their spatial locations. We previously showed that location information biases object identity judgments: when two objects share the same location, subjects are more likely to judge them as the same shape (Golomb & Kupitz, VSS 2013). This spatial "congruency bias" is automatic, insuppressible, and unidirectional (object shape does not influence location judgments). Here we examined: (1) if location is truly unique in driving this bias, and (2) how the binding process is influenced by the manipulation of multiple object dimensions. Subjects saw two sequentially presented novel "objects" in the periphery and were instructed to make a same/different comparison of either the objects' shape or color (blocked tasks). Importantly, the objects were independently manipulated along three dimensions: shape, color, and location. Replicating our previous results, when the objects shared a location, subjects reported significantly more "same identity" responses in the shape task. Signal detection theory analyses confirmed the bias, with increases in both hits and false alarms when location was the same. Additionally, we observed a similar location bias in the color task. Interestingly, this bias was unique to location: color did not bias shape judgments, nor did shape bias color judgments. Irrelevant shape and color information did influence how quickly subjects responded (priming), but object location was the only irrelevant dimension that actually biased the responses. Together, these findings provide further evidence for a special role of location in object perception, suggesting that object location is uniquely and automatically encoded – and bound – during object recognition. Preliminary fMRI investigations suggest that the lateral occipital complex (LOC), parietal cortex, and medial temporal lobe may reflect neural substrates of this spatial congruency bias.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.