August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
The structure of spatial knowledge: Do humans learn the geometry, topology, or stable properties of the environment?
Author Affiliations
  • Jonathan Ericson
    Brown University
  • William Warren
    Brown University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1342. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jonathan Ericson, William Warren; The structure of spatial knowledge: Do humans learn the geometry, topology, or stable properties of the environment?. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1342.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The present experiments tested three hypotheses about the structure of spatial knowledge used for navigation: the Euclidean, Topological, and Stability Hypotheses. We selectively destabilized three geometric properties of the environment during learning: metric, neighborhood, or graph structure. If spatial knowledge is primarily Euclidean, performance on all tasks should deteriorate when metric structure is destabilized; if spatial knowledge is primarily topological, performance should reflect the graph when metric and neighborhood structure are destabilized; if navigators acquire whatever geometric properties are stable during learning, performance should reflect the stable structure in each environment. Method. During learning, 10 groups of participants (N=120) walked in one of four virtual hedge mazes containing 10 target objects: (1) The Control Maze preserved all three properties. (2) Elastic Maze I preserved the place graph but destabilized Euclidean and neighborhood structure by stretching some hallways across neighborhood boundaries 50% of the time. Metric information (from path integration) but not visual information for these boundaries was available. (3) Elastic Maze II added visual information for these neighborhood boundaries. (4) The Swap Maze preserved neighborhoods but destabilized Euclidean and graph structure by swapping certain object locations 50% of the time. In the test phase, spatial knowledge was probed in one of three navigation tasks: (a) metric shortcut task, to assess Euclidean knowledge, (b) neighborhood shortcut task, to assess knowledge of neighborhoods, (c) route task, to assess graph knowledge. Results are inconsistent with Euclidean and Stability hypotheses, but support the Topological hypothesis. Metric shortcuts are highly unreliable (Angular Deviations ~24° in Control maze) and neighborhood shortcuts suffer even when neighborhoods are stable (21.4% incorrect in Swap maze). But the place graph is learned in all environments (96% accuracy on route task). Spatial knowledge appears to be primarily topological, consistent with a labeled graph that incorporates approximate local distances and angles.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.