August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
A possible marker of configural processing at the N170: Converging evidence from typical participants and a case of prosopagnosia
Author Affiliations
  • Natalie Mestry
    Psychology, University of Southampton, UK
  • Tamaryn Menneer
    Psychology, University of Southampton, UK
  • Michael J. Wenger
    Psychology, University of Oklahoma, OK, USA
  • Rosaleen McCarthy
    Psychology, University of Southampton, UK
  • Nick Donnelly
    Psychology, University of Southampton, UK
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1437. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Natalie Mestry, Tamaryn Menneer, Michael J. Wenger, Rosaleen McCarthy, Nick Donnelly; A possible marker of configural processing at the N170: Converging evidence from typical participants and a case of prosopagnosia. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1437.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Both orientation and Thatcherisation are thought to influence configural processing in faces (Boutsen, Humphreys, Praamastra & Warbrick, 2006). We explored the effect of orientation and level of Thatcherisation (typical face, eyes Thatcherised, mouth Thatcherised, or both features Thatcherised) on early ERP components. Participants showed evidence of inversion effects leading to increased amplitude for inverted faces at the N170 and reduced amplitude to inverted faces at the P2. However, the effect of Thatcherisation was only evident in the right hemisphere N170 where there was a reduction in N170 amplitude with level of Thatcherisation. These data suggest two distinct processes (consistent with Towler, Gosling, Duchaine, & Eimer, 2012). In a follow-up study using the same task we tested PHD, an individual with acquired prosopagnosia known to be unable to perceive the Thatcher illusion (Mestry, Donnelly, Menneer & McCarthy, 2012). We did so to explore whether the markers of orientation and Thatcherisation would survive in the ERP in the absence of sensitivity to the Thatcher illusion. PHD did show a significant effect of inversion at both the N170 and P2. However, PHD produced no effect of Thatcherisation at the N170, in contrast to the effect found with typical participants. The results suggest that the effect of Thatcherisation manifest in the right hemisphere N170 underpins the perception of the Thatcher illusion. As the effects of orientation at the N170 and P2 are also found in an individual who does not perceive the illusion, then they cannot reflect the type of configural processing affected by the Thatcher illusion (Donnelly, Cornes and Menner, 2012). In conclusion, the novel N170 Thatcherisation effect is a marker of a kind of configural processing present in typical face processing that is affected by Thatcherisation (Mestry, Menneer, Wenger, & Donnelly, 2012).

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.