December 2014
Volume 14, Issue 15
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2014
Turning silver to gold – blue-yellow asymmetries in color perception
Author Affiliations
  • Alissa D. Winkler
    Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Michael A. Webster
    Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno
Journal of Vision December 2014, Vol.14, 32. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alissa D. Winkler, Michael A. Webster; Turning silver to gold – blue-yellow asymmetries in color perception. Journal of Vision 2014;14(15):32.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Achromatic settings are known to vary more along bluish-yellowish axes than reddish-greenish, following roughly the daylight locus of natural illuminants. We explored an additional asymmetry along the blue-yellow dimension, in which “blue” stimuli appear much more desaturated than their “yellow” complements. These differences were quantified with both a color naming task, which mapped out the gamut of chromaticities that appeared gray, and by a saturation matching task between pairs of opposing chromatic axes. The losses in blue saturation appear strongest when the colors are presented as luminance increments. They are inconsistent with chromatic aberration because they persist with uniform fields. They are also inconsistent with cone-specific (e.g. S cone) nonlinearities, because they are stronger along the blue-yellow axis (−45 deg in the LM vs S plane) than along an axis with the same component cardinal-mechanism contrasts combined in opposite phase (+45 deg in the LM vs S plane). This suggests a post-receptoral site for the effects. The blue-yellow asymmetries can have a surprisingly large effect on perceived color. For example, images of tin or silver objects - which appear largely achromatic - become distinctly copper or gold when displayed with the equivalent complementary chromaticity. They may also explain why photographic negatives (e.g. of faces) sometimes appear conspicuously less colorful than their positive counterparts, even though they contain an equivalent gamut of chromaticities. Supported by EY-10834


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.