December 2014
Volume 14, Issue 15
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2014
Defocus blur discrimination in natural viewing
Author Affiliations
  • Stephen Sebastian
    Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin
  • Wilson S. Geisler
    Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin
  • Johannes Burge
    Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin and Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania
Journal of Vision December 2014, Vol.14, 82. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Stephen Sebastian, Wilson S. Geisler, Johannes Burge; Defocus blur discrimination in natural viewing. Journal of Vision 2014;14(15):82.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Defocus blur is a useful cue in many biological tasks. However, the extent to which the variability in natural images affects the discriminability of defocus blur is unknown. Here, we measured discrimination of retinal image blur created by the eye's optics, for a large collection of well-focused natural image patches. We constructed a psychophysical apparatus capable of presenting stimuli at three distances simultaneously along the line of sight. Half-silvered mirrors combined light from three monitors positioned at variable distances from the subject. The stimuli were rendered sharply on each monitor so that defocus blur was created by the optics of the subject's eye, as in natural viewing. Observers viewed stimuli through a 4 mm artificial pupil. Accommodation was paralyzed. On each trial, two different natural image patches were foveally presented in a 2IFC paradigm. The observer identified the interval with the sharper image. Throughout the experiment, each trial contained a different pair of image patches. Luminance was fixed across all trials (18 cd/m2). Contrast was matched within a trial, but varied between trials. Defocus blur discrimination thresholds were measured for three subjects across multiple standard defocus levels between 0.0 and 1.125D. For each standard, 6 comparison levels were presented, above and below the standard. The discrimination threshold was 0.18D on average across conditions. Thresholds did not vary significantly between subjects. Thresholds were constant below 1.0D, but rose for higher defocus levels. These findings suggest that natural image variability is a significant determinant of performance limits with natural stimuli under natural conditions.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.