Although some have argued that thresholds for discriminations of RF patterns fall at the rate of probability summation for an incomplete RF pattern (one with fewer cycles than is required to fill 360°) and that thresholds then drop steeply once the entire (whole) pattern is modulated (Schmidtmann, Kennedy, Orbach, & Loffler,
2012), our prior data and those of others typically show a smooth decrease in threshold with increasing numbers of cycles (Dickinson et al.,
2010; Dickinson, McGinty, Webster, & Badcock,
2012; Loffler et al.,
2003; Tan et al.,
2013). Schmidtmann et al. (
2012) did however extend the investigation of detection of modulation in RF patterns to the detection of an increment in amplitude of modulation. Global integration/pooling of local components is invoked as an explanation for this superior performance. The presence of integration, the improvement in threshold in excess of that predicted by probability summation, has led to the suggestion that a specialized process exists in the human visual system for the detection of the shape of bounding contours (Kempgens, Loffler, & Orbach,
2013; Poirier & Wilson,
2006). The probability summation prediction used in this study is derived from the fitted parameter
Q of the Quick function (see
Equation 3). Specifically the rate of decrease of threshold is predicted to fall according to a power function with an index of −1/
Q. This is the method conventionally applied in studies examining integration of shape information in RF patterns (Bell & Badcock,
2008; Dickinson et al.,
2010; Dickinson et al.,
2012; Loffler et al.,
2003; Schmidtmann et al.,
2012; Tan et al.,
2013). The method makes the assumption that the threshold for each detector is sufficiently high that a false positive detection result cannot be caused by random physiological noise—a High Threshold Theory assumption. It has been pointed out that other formulations of probability summation can give different predictions under certain experimental circumstances (Meese & Summers,
2012; Pelli,
1985; Tyler & Chen,
2000) and that under such circumstances a Signal Detection Theory treatment might be preferred (Laming,
2013; Meese & Summers,
2012; Nachmias,
1981). A second common assumption of High Threshold Theory is that of a linear transduction of signal. The Quick (
1974) function, however, employs an accelerating non-linearity at low contrast and Wilson (
1980) shows that, for spatial integration of information by an ideal signal detector, the probability summation prediction formulated by Quick (
1974) is consistent with that arrived at following a non-linear transduction followed by signal detection argument. The Quick function incorporates an accelerating nonlinearity at low contrasts and a compressive nonlinearity at high contrasts and has proved to be a good fit to our psychometric data in the circumstances in which we have employed it. Moreover, for certain experimental conditions of this study, the integration of shape information is approximately linear. That is, the index of the power function describing the reduction in threshold as number of cycles of modulation is increased approaches −1, demonstrating that the integration of information in these conditions is almost ideal and cannot be attributed to probability summation.