Allen (
1954) found that Listing's law does not hold during vertical or horizontal vergence. In the 1990s, several groups studied the quantitative effects of vergence on rotational kinematics and found that while rotation axes of monocular eye movements are still confined to a plane when vergence is held constant, a change in vergence changes the orientation of these planes (Mok et al.,
1992; van Rijn & van den Berg,
1993). When the eyes are converged by an angle
ν, the two eyes' reference positions and Listing's planes rotate outward by a fraction of the vergence angle,
μν, in a pattern that has been likened to the opening of saloon doors (Tweed,
1997). This has been called L2 to indicate that it is a binocular version of the monocular Listing's law, which it contains as a special case for
μ = 0. The various studies did not agree on the empirical value of
μ. It has been argued that L2 benefits the oculomotor system during vertical movements by maintaining vertical and torsional alignment of the retinal images located within the visual plane (Misslisch, Tweed, & Hess,
2001; Schreiber, Crawford, Fetter, & Tweed,
2001; Schreiber, Tweed, & Schor,
2006; Tweed,
1997). The theoretical optimum for achieving alignment would be an L2 with
μ = 0.5; that is, each eye's Listing's plane and primary position rotate temporally by half the total vergence angle. Note that because of the half-angle rule, this is equivalent to the displacement planes for straight ahead rotating temporally by a quarter of the total horizontal vergence.