September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Domain-General Representation of Visual Aesthetic Appreciation in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex
Author Affiliations
  • Edward Vessel
    New York University, Center for Brain Imaging New York University, Dept. of Psychology
  • Jonathan Stahl
    New York University, Dept. of Psychology
  • Isaac Purton
    New York University, Dept. of Psychology
  • Gabrielle Starr
    New York University, Dept. of English
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 124. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Edward Vessel, Jonathan Stahl, Isaac Purton, Gabrielle Starr; Domain-General Representation of Visual Aesthetic Appreciation in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):124.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Are there “domain-general” neural processes that support aesthetic appreciation regardless of stimulus type, similar to the encoding of abstract expected value of goods? Recent work examining face and place attractiveness reported a common representation of attractiveness in medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; Pegors et al., in press). We sought to test a) whether moving aesthetic experiences with artwork and architecture, artifacts of human culture that show much more individualistic preferences than landscapes or faces, rely on similar domain-general patterns of activation in MPFC, and b) whether such putative domain-general mechanisms overlap with the default-mode network (DMN), previously shown to be engaged by highly moving artworks (Vessel et al., 2012). Thirteen observers made aesthetic judgments (“how much does this image move you?”) about images of artworks, natural landscapes, or architecture on a continuous scale while being scanned using fMRI. Classifiers were trained to distinguish most vs. least moving trials using patterns of trialwise BOLD responses. When provided data from the entire MPFC, classifiers trained on one category and tested on another performed better than chance for all train/test combinations (63-67%, p< 0.01), providing evidence for a domain-general aesthetic mechanism in the MPFC. Furthermore, classifiers trained on patterns from a spatially restricted ROI corresponding to the left anterior MPFC portion of the DMN (derived from subject-specific “rest” scans), also performed better than chance (55-62%, p< 0.02), providing strong evidence that this portion of the DMN contains domain-general information about aesthetic appreciation. We also found that when classifiers were trained and tested on images of the same category (halfwise-split; using the entire MPFC), performance was best for artworks (72%, p< 0.01), followed by landscapes (60%, p< 0.05), and lastly architecture (53%, n.s.), which suggests that MPFC as a whole contained more information about the aesthetic appeal of artworks than for the other categories.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.