September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Does segmentation influence rapid scene categorization?
Author Affiliations
  • Jonas Kubilius
    Laboratory of Biological Psychology, KU Leuven Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, KU Leuven
  • Lee de-Wit
    Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, KU Leuven
  • Hans Op de Beeck
    Laboratory of Biological Psychology, KU Leuven
  • Johan Wagemans
    Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, KU Leuven
  • Caitlin Mullin
    Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, KU Leuven
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 350. doi:10.1167/15.12.350
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jonas Kubilius, Lee de-Wit, Hans Op de Beeck, Johan Wagemans, Caitlin Mullin; Does segmentation influence rapid scene categorization?. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):350. doi: 10.1167/15.12.350.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Converging evidence from behavioral, neural, and computational investigations has led to the theory that rapid scene categorization can be performed based on the extraction of simple features (e.g. oriented edges, colors, etc.) and does not necessarily require an organization of these features into coherent parts, objects, or surfaces. This is consistent with findings that many perceptual grouping tasks and image segmentation in general are computationally expensive processes requiring multiple iterations of feedback. Therefore, these grouping and segmentation processes must take place after scene category information has already been computed (a process assumed to be rapid and feedforward). In a series of three experiments, we questioned whether segmentation processes indeed did not play a role in the rapid scene categorization. In particular, if categorization were only based on feature extraction, with relations between features or objects playing only a minor role, segmentation cues should not influence categorization accuracy. If, however, categorization was also based on the relations between these features, misleading segmentation cues should impede categorization performance. In each trial, we presented participants with two scenes divided into four parts, using segmentation cues displayed for 300 ms prior to image onset. These cues established either a congruent (supporting the correct image segmentation into two scenes) or incongruent (pushing observers to incorrectly group scene segments) figure-ground segmentation on the display. We found that participants were less accurate in scene categorization when incongruent segmentation cues were presented, indicating that segmentation plays a role in rapid categorization decisions. Moreover, the effect remained robust even when the cues were presented concurrently with the images, suggesting that whilst scene categorization might be rapid, it also interacts with equally fast mechanisms of scene segmentation.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.