September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Relating sustained attention to visual long-term memory
Author Affiliations
  • Megan deBettencourt
    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University
  • Kenneth Norman
    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University Department of Psychology, Princeton University
  • Nicholas Turk-Browne
    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University Department of Psychology, Princeton University
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 444. doi:10.1167/15.12.444
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Megan deBettencourt, Kenneth Norman, Nicholas Turk-Browne; Relating sustained attention to visual long-term memory. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):444. doi: 10.1167/15.12.444.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Attention naturally fluctuates when it needs to be sustained for long periods of time. These fluctuations have immediate consequences for performance on current tasks, but their consequences for the encoding of current information into visual long-term memory (VLTM) are less well understood. In particular, although the effects of selective attention and divided attention on memory have been explored, the relationship between sustained attention and memory is less clear. We hypothesized that, in a sustained attention task, being in an attentive state just prior to the presentation of an image would lead to better subsequent VLTM for that image. Based on previous studies of sustained attention, we operationalized attentiveness as slower and less variable response times (RTs). In a first incidental encoding phase of the experiment, observers categorized trial-unique pictures of scenes as indoor or outdoor by pressing one of two buttons. Critically, the scenes were selected to be 90% from one subcategory and 10% from the other, which encouraged observers to lapse into making the more frequent response habitually, thereby inducing fluctuations in sustained attention. In the second phase of the experiment, observers performed a surprise recognition memory test in which they were shown old images (that had appeared in the first phase) and new images. They were asked to decide whether they had seen each image before, as well as to report their confidence. Using these memory responses, we returned to the sustained attention task data and found that stimuli that were subsequently remembered vs. forgotten were indeed preceded by trials with slower and less variable RTs. These results suggest that the dangers of attentional failures may not only be realized in the moment, but also in the future when we need to access memories from those episodes.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.