September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
The Identity-Location Binding Problem
Author Affiliations
  • Piers Howe
    School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010
  • Adam Ferguson
    School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/15.12.568
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Piers Howe, Adam Ferguson; The Identity-Location Binding Problem. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):568. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.12.568.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The effortlessness of vision belies the challenges faced by the visual system. Different attributes of an object, such as its colour, shape, size and location, are often processed independently, sometimes in different cortical areas. The results of these separate analyses have to be combined before an object can be seen as a single coherent entity and not just a collection of unrelated attributes. Without visual binding you can be aware of the individual object attributes but binding is required for you to be able to perceive whether or not a given object has a particular combination of these attributes. Visual bindings are typically initiated and updated in a serial fashion, one object at a time. In contrast to this, here we show that one type of binding, location-identity binding, can be updated in parallel. The location-identity binding problem is the problem of knowing which objects are where in the visual scene. Using complementary techniques, the simultaneous-sequential paradigm and systems factorial technology, we examine the computational processing that underlies the updating of these bindings. Although these techniques make different assumptions and rely on different behavioral measures, both came to the same conclusion. Our findings are surprising, strongly constrain several theories of visual perception and help resolve an apparent conflict in the field.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×