September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Spatially-Specific Repetition Suppression in Transsaccadic Perception
Author Affiliations
  • Scott Fairhall
    Center for Mind/Brain Science, University of Trento, Italy
  • Jens Schwarzbach
    Center for Mind/Brain Science, University of Trento, Italy
  • Martijn van Koningsbruggen
    Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems@UniTn, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy
  • Angelika Lingnau
    Center for Mind/Brain Science, University of Trento, Italy
  • David Melcher
    Center for Mind/Brain Science, University of Trento, Italy
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 603. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Scott Fairhall, Jens Schwarzbach, Martijn van Koningsbruggen, Angelika Lingnau, David Melcher; Spatially-Specific Repetition Suppression in Transsaccadic Perception. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):603.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Brain representations of visual space are predominantly eye-centered (retinotopic) yet our experience of the world is largely world-centered (spatiotopic). A long-standing question is how the brain creates continuity between these reference frames across successive eye movements (saccades). Here we use fMRI to address whether spatially specific repetition suppression (RS) is evident during transsaccadic perception. Nine participants were presented with two successive Gabor patches (S1 and S2) displayed in either the upper or lower visual field, to the left or right of fixation. Spatial congruency was manipulated by having S1 and S2 occur in the same or different upper/lower visual field. On half the trials, a saccade was cued between S1 and S2, which placed spatiotopic and retinotopic reference frames in opposition. Equivalent frontoparietal RS was observed when S1-S2 were spatiotopically congruent, irrespective of whether retinotopic and spatiotopic coordinates were in accord or were placed in opposition by a saccade. RS was maximal in the superior parietal lobe and the frontal eye fields (p< .005, corrected). Further examination of saccade trials in classically retinotopic visual regions revealed RS for spatially congruent S2 as early as extrastriate (but not striate) cortex (p< .005). Collectively, these results show that transsaccadic RS is contingent on the spatial congruency of the two stimuli, that spatiotopic representations emerge in extrastriate cortex and that by the level of the frontoparietal network, spatiotopically consistent stimuli can be processed in a similar way irrespective of retinotopic congruency.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.