September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Information gain does not modulate the facilitation of saccades by a perceptual task
Author Affiliations
  • Christian Wolf
    Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen
  • Alexander Schütz
    Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 607. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christian Wolf, Alexander Schütz; Information gain does not modulate the facilitation of saccades by a perceptual task. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):607.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Visual acuity is best in the fovea and declines in the peripheral retina. Eye movements are used to project interesting objects onto the fovea, to acquire high-acuity information. Consistently, it has been shown that eye movement latencies are reduced if participants have to perform a perceptual task at the saccade target (Montagnini & Chelazzi, 2005). So far it is unknown if this facilitation is a general effect of the task, or if it depends on the gain in information by the eye movements. Here we tested if saccade latencies are sensitive to pre-saccadic peripheral visibility, post-saccadic foveal visibility or the ration of the two, which is the information gain. Observers had to foveate peripherally appearing plaid stimuli consisting of a vertical and a horizontal component and judge the orientation of the vertical component. We varied the contrast ratio of the two components while the overall contrast remained constant. To independently manipulate peripheral and foveal visibility, we changed the plaid during the saccade. Both, peripheral and foveal visibility could either be above or below previously determined individual thresholds. As a control, we measured saccade latencies without any perceptual task with varying contrast ratios. Perceptual performance followed the pattern intended by the manipulation. Without perceptual task, latencies were not influenced by the contrast ratio of the plaid. Consistently with previous reports, latencies were reduced by about 40 ms with perceptual task, even when a fast saccade was maladaptive because peripheral visibility was higher than foveal visibility. While foveal visibility did not affect latencies, there was a tendency towards reduced latencies with poor peripheral visibility. These results indicate that perceptual tasks generally facilitate eye movements, independently of peripheral and foveal visibility. This suggests that eye movement latencies are not equally modulated by informational gain as by motivational gain (Milstein & Dorris, 2007).

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.