September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Knowledge effects on slant estimation are mediated by Conscientiousness
Author Affiliations
  • Abigail Robinson
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Jaehyun Oh
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Christopher Thomson
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Ruth Talbot
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Catherine Norris
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Frank Durgin
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 735. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Abigail Robinson, Jaehyun Oh, Christopher Thomson, Ruth Talbot, Catherine Norris, Frank Durgin; Knowledge effects on slant estimation are mediated by Conscientiousness. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):735.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Estimates of (geographical) hill slant are often higher for women than men. We collected estimates of slant for several hills from a cross-section of people from the nearby community and from college students. Prior research has suggested that knowledge about hill slant (e.g., from experience with skiing) has a corrective impact on hill slant estimation but that this could not account for sex differences found (Stigliani et al., 2010). We looked for sex-linked effects on estimation that might be due to personality factors (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability) and spatial skills (Mental Rotation) as well as fitness (BMI) and height. Participants were 58 students (27 female, age range 18-22) and 48 non-students (33 female, age range 18-72). Three hills were tested in fixed order (9°, 22.5° and 4.5°). At the first hill a manual slant match (free hand measure), a visual slant match, and a verbal estimate were collected (in that order). Only verbal estimates were collected at the other two hills. Participants subsequently filled out personality surveys, did a mental rotation task, identified background knowledge they might have about hill slant perception/estimation and provided demographic information. All three measures given for the first hill were reliably correlated with one another (manual/visual r=0.50; visual/verbal r=0.54; manual/verbal r=0.33), so we report analyses of the verbal estimates across all three hills. None of the factors we considered could explain the sex differences in slant estimation in our study. We did find strong effects of knowledge concerning slant (which lowered slant estimates), and a reliable trend for slant estimates to become lower (more accurate) with increasing age (possibly an effect of increasing implicit knowledge). The effect of knowledge was mediated by Conscientiousness such that conscientious people were more likely to take their knowledge of slant overestimation into account when estimating slant.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.