September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Shifts of Object-Based Attention Differ Across Visual Field Meridians
Author Affiliations
  • Adam Barnas
    Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  • Adam Greenberg
    Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 900. doi:10.1167/15.12.900
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Adam Barnas, Adam Greenberg; Shifts of Object-Based Attention Differ Across Visual Field Meridians. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):900. doi: 10.1167/15.12.900.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Object-based attention (OBA) leads to preferential processing of visual information within the boundaries of an attended object. Pilz et al. (2012) demonstrated that this preferential processing was larger for horizontally-oriented rectangles than for vertically-oriented rectangles. However, Greenberg et al. (VSS, 2014) showed that, when controlling for shifts of attention across the vertical meridian of the visual field (thereby eliminating attention shifts across this axis), effects of object orientation are eliminated, suggesting that object orientation may not affect OBA. These studies used the double-rectangle cueing paradigm (Egly et al., 1994) in which attention shifts between objects are contrasted against shifts within objects. Our goal here was to examine the distribution of solely within-object shifts across the meridians. Eighteen participants viewed an object consisting of a vertical rectangle and a horizontal rectangle joined to form a unified object in the shape of a right angle. While subjects fixated centrally, the object vertex was randomly positioned in one screen quadrant on each trial such that one object component always crossed the vertical meridian and the other always crossed the horizontal meridian. Following a peripheral cue at the object vertex, the target appeared at the cued location (“valid”), or at one of two locations equidistant from the cue - the uncued location of the horizontal component (“invalid-horizontal”) or the uncued location of the vertical component (“invalid-vertical”). Results showed that participants were faster to detect valid targets compared to invalid targets. Furthermore, RTs varied by target hemifield, regardless of cue location. However, contrary to our hypothesis, participants were faster for invalid-horizontal locations than for invalid-vertical locations, suggesting that OBA is distributed more efficiently along the horizontal meridian than the vertical meridian. Thus, OBA may be allocated unevenly within objects that cross the vertical versus horizontal meridian of the visual field.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.