September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Representational biases in the perception of visuospatial orientation: Gravitational and other reference frames
Author Affiliations
  • Frank Durgin
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Brennan Klein
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Christopher Thomson
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Elizabeth Cifuentes
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 1036. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Frank Durgin, Brennan Klein, Christopher Thomson, Elizabeth Cifuentes; Representational biases in the perception of visuospatial orientation: Gravitational and other reference frames. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):1036.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Two very different bias functions may be observed in the study of perceived 2D orientation of visual stimuli. One bias function is symmetrical between vertical and horizontal. This “cardinal” bias (e.g., Gischick et al. 2011) has sometimes been argued to be a front-end coding bias due to the overrepresentation of vertical and horizontal in natural scenes and in visual cortex. The second, “categorical” bias function (Dick & Hochstein, 1989) is asymmetrical; it exaggerates angular deviations from horizontal while underestimating deviations from vertical with the consequence that orientations that are only 37-40° from horizontal are judged to bisect the angular distance between horizontal and vertical (Durgin & Li, 2011). Here we report that both of these biases appear to be yoked to the perceived gravitational reference frame: When observers are positioned at an attitude of 45° so that retinal and gravitational reference frames are dissociated, it is the perceived gravitational reference frame that matters most. In the case of the categorical bias, the gravitational horizontal seems to provide a particularly strong reference orientation, consistent with the importance of the gravitational ground plane. In the case of the cardinal bias, which is measured by comparison between two orientations, the gravitational reference-frame dominance is clearly inconsistent with an account based on cortical over-representation of cardinal orientations. More likely, for purposes of comparison, orientations are coded relative to a perceptually-given reference frame that is divided into quadrants. Cardinal bias might therefore be understood as resulting from representational range compression within each perceptual quadrant. In a series of five experiments we show that noisy orientation textures composed of variably-oriented gabor patches can show both kinds of cognitive orientation bias, and that both biases are yoked to perceptual rather than retinal reference frames.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.