September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Perceptual Training and Competition for Representation in Visual Cortex
Author Affiliations
  • Paige Scalf
    Department of Psychology, Durham University
  • Samantha Srivathsan Koushik
    Department of Psychology, The University of Arizona
  • Autri Hafezi
    Department of Psychology, The University of Arizona
  • Erica Wager
    Department of Psychology, The University of Arizona
  • Jonathan Folstein
    Department of Psychology The Florida State University
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 1128. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Paige Scalf, Samantha Srivathsan Koushik, Autri Hafezi, Erica Wager, Jonathan Folstein; Perceptual Training and Competition for Representation in Visual Cortex. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):1128. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

When multiple stimuli simultaneously fall within the receptive fields of a common cell population, they compete fore representation via a series of mutually inhibitory interactions (e.g. Duncan & Desimone, 1995). Competition is reduced if the items form a single perceptual entity, either due to lower level perceptual grouping factors such as shape or color (McMains & Kastner, 2010) or higher level relationships such as actions affordance (e.g. Wager, Humphreys & Scalf, 2014). In this study, we investigate whether the relationships that reduce competition among multiple stimuli can be learned in a brief series of perceptual training sessions (~five sessions). Participants learned to name individuals groups of five peripherally presented stimulus items. We measured blood oxygen-level dependent BOLD activity evoked in visual cortex by the trained stimulus configuration and compared it with that evoked by the same stimuli presented in untrained configurations. Competition for representation was quantified by comparing signal evoked when stimuli were presented simultaneously (and were thus likely to compete for representation) with that evoked by stimuli that were presented sequentially (and were thus unlikely to compete for representation). Preliminary data indicate that stimuli compete less for representation when presented in trained than in untrained configurations. The relationships that allow multiple stimuli to be simultaneously represented can be acquired after relatively brief sequences of perceptual training.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.