September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Evaluation of a Phantogram Groundplane for the Study of Visually Guided Walking Behavior
Author Affiliations
  • Gabriel Diaz
    Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institue of Technology
  • Andrew Smith
    Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institue of Technology
  • Kamran Binaee
    Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institue of Technology
  • Rahul Gopinathan
    Computer Science, Rochester Institute of Technology
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 1327. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gabriel Diaz, Andrew Smith, Kamran Binaee, Rahul Gopinathan; Evaluation of a Phantogram Groundplane for the Study of Visually Guided Walking Behavior. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):1327.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Humans in the natural environment are able to maintain efficient and stable gait across complex terrain. In part, this is because visual feedback is used to guide changes in heading, foot placement, and posture. However, the role of vision in the control of gait is not well understood. We present a novel methodology for the study of visually guided walking over complex terrain in a laboratory setting. A perceptually three-dimensional ground-plane is projected upon a physically flat laboratory floor, similar to a one-plane CAVE environment. The percept of height is reinforced through the use of stereoscopic shutter glasses, and by the dynamic updating of the projected image to maintain the coincidence of the accidental perspective with the subject’s motion-tracked head position. The benefits of this “phantogram” groundplane are numerous. Obstacle height, shape, and location can be instantaneously manipulated. Because the groundplane is physically flat, the likelihood of falls is dramatically reduced. Because head position and object positions are known, the environment facilitates the computational analysis of eye-tracking data. The apparatus also opens the possibility of real-time manipulations of the environment that are contingent upon the participant’s behavior. In summary, the apparatus facilitates rigorous hypotheses testing in a controlled environment, presumably, with minimal degradation to the visual experience. We have tested this assertion in a validation study. The subject was asked to approach and step over an obstacle of three possible heights, scaled in units of leg length, and randomized between trials. Between blocks, the obstacle was varied between a real-world or phantogram type. Data shows that subjects treat the phantogram and real-world obstacles similarly, thus validating the methodology for the study of naturalistic walking behavior.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.