September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Intercepting a learned moving target: On-line or model-based control?
Author Affiliations
  • Huaiyong Zhao
    Brown University
  • William Warren
    Brown University
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 1332. doi:10.1167/15.12.1332
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Huaiyong Zhao, William Warren; Intercepting a learned moving target: On-line or model-based control?. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):1332. doi: 10.1167/15.12.1332.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

When walking to intercept a moving target, occluding the target severely impairs performance, consistent with on-line control by the constant bearing strategy (Zhao & Warren, 2014). Alternatively, interception might be controlled by an internal model of the target’s motion, which is updated by current information (Diaz, et al., 2013). Here we ask whether an internal model of target motion can be learned over multiple training trials, and then used to guide interception during occlusion. Participants (N=10) walked in a virtual environment (12m x 12m), and displays were presented stereoscopically in a head mounted display (63°H x 53°V, 60 Hz), while head position was tracked (60 Hz). The target initially moved at 0.6 or 0.8m/s, and after 3s changed speed by -0.3, -0.2, 0.0, +0.2 or +0.3m/s. Each participant performed five experimental sessions, with one speed change per session. A session consisted of a learning block of 40 trials in which the target was always visible, followed by a test block of 24 trials in which the target was occluded 2.5s after it started moving. Occluding the target significantly impaired interception accuracy and precision (p< 0.01). An analysis of heading adjustments prior to the occlusion point indicates that participants learned to anticipate the speed change: they turned more in sessions when the target would speed up and turned less in sessions when the target would slow down. However, heading adjustments after the occlusion point indicate that participants did not adaptively adjust their heading during occlusion, but made a stereotyped turn. The results suggest that an internal model of the target’s motion is not learned or used to guide interception in the absence of visual information, rather, interception is normally controlled on-line. The target’s motion can be anticipated, but only when it is visible, possibly by modifying the constant bearing strategy.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.