Journal of Vision is an outstanding journal, in large measure because of the contributions of the reviewers who give so freely of their time and expertise to critically evaluating manuscripts for the journal. We always attempt to ascertain that reviewers not only provide the necessary expertise but also are fair in their judgment, reflecting the significant responsibilities of reviewers to the editors, authors, and readers of the journal (see below, based on Council of Science Editors White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications:
http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/).
While the editorial board members ultimately make the decisions, they rely on our expert reviewers to
Likewise, authors rely on our expert reviewers to
Our readers rely on the reviewers to
In short, reviewers are the backbone of the journal, providing critical input to the editors, authors, and readers. This year, 728 reviewers generously contributed their time and expertise to reviewing manuscripts for
Journal of Vision (many providing multiple reviews). We thank
each of our colleagues who reviewed manuscripts for
Journal of Vision in the past year.
Journal of Vision would not be the outstanding journal that it is without your generous and expert contributions.