August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Accounting for cognitive effort in a visual working memory task in 13- and 15-month old infants
Author Affiliations
  • Chen Cheng
    Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston
  • Zsuzsa Kaldy
    Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston
  • Erik Blaser
    Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 67. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chen Cheng, Zsuzsa Kaldy, Erik Blaser; Accounting for cognitive effort in a visual working memory task in 13- and 15-month old infants. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):67.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Introduction. Development brings improvements in visual working memory performance, but it is not clear whether this is caused by an increase in memory capacity per se, or by increases in cognitive effort and/or task engagement. Through pupillometric measures and behavioral coding of task engagement during a Delayed Match Retrieval task (Kaldy, Guillory, & Blaser, 2015), we sought to tease these factors apart. Method. Two groups of infants (younger, mean age = 13.6 months, and older, mean age = 15.5 months; N=16) performed 12 trials of an object-location binding task requiring anticipatory looks to the remembered locations of matching (virtual) cards. We video-recorded participants while a Tobii T120 eye-tracker monitored gaze and pupil dilation. Subsequently, three observers (blind to the events on the screen) scored infants' disengagement by timing periods when the infant looked away from the screen. Cognitive effort was measured through phasic, task-evoked pupil responses. Results. As expected, older infants significantly outperformed younger infants on the memory task (F(1,15) = 7.422, p = .015). This age difference could not be explained by disengagement episode counts (F(1,15) = .996, p = .33) nor accumulated disengagement time (F(1,15) = 1.449, p = .247). However, pupillometry revealed significantly greater task-evoked responses in the older group during the critical 'encoding' phase of the memory task, when to-be-remembered stimuli were presented (see supplemental material). Conclusion. Our results show that cognitive effort, as measured by task-evoked pupil responses, is likely a better predictor of performance than more global measures of disengagement, such as looks away from the screen. Further pupillometric analyses will enable the precise quantification the role of cognitive effort in infants' visual working memory performance.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.