August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Fixation sequence consistency during face identification
Author Affiliations
  • Yuliy Tsank
    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Miguel Eckstein
    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 69. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yuliy Tsank, Miguel Eckstein; Fixation sequence consistency during face identification . Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):69.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

When performing face discrimination tasks (i.e. identification, gender discrimination etc.) using multiple saccades, humans use idiosyncratic fixation strategies (Kanan et al. 2015; Mehoudar et al. 2014; Peterson and Eckstein, 2012; Walker-Smith et al. 1977). Here we analyze observers' consistent use of their preferred fixation sequence across trials during face identification and investigate its relationship to perceptual performance. Methods: Fifty five observers completed a 1 of 10 face (15 deg) identification task in white luminance noise. Observers made free eye movements in varying numbers of blocks of 125 trials each (125 - 1500 trials total) with a face viewing time of 1500ms. Each of the 10 faces were divided into 10 areas of interest in order to assign a number (1-10) to each fixation position. We analyzed the similarity of fixation sequences across trials corresponding to specific faces within a subject using only the first 3 fixations from each trial. We used the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm (Scanmatch, Cristino et al. 2010) to obtain a similarity score for fixation sequences between trials. Results: Fixation sequences that included foveating the eyes as well as an area that is centered between the eyes and nose were the most common and represented 12% of all trials across observers. Consistent use of individual-specific fixation areas varied across observers from 8% to 50% of all trials. Critically, we show that observers that consistently use more similar fixation sequences achieve higher performance in the task (r = 0.4; p< .01). Conclusion: Our results extend previous findings on variations across individuals in fixation strategies to faces. The present findings suggest that consistent use of a preferred idiosyncratic fixation sequence also varies greatly across individuals and that observers with greater consistency achieve higher perceptual performance.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.