August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Oculomotor Measures of Learning Attentional Templates
Author Affiliations
  • Christian Olivers
    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Artem Belopolsky
    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 120. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christian Olivers, Artem Belopolsky; Oculomotor Measures of Learning Attentional Templates. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):120.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Visual selection is served by attentional templates, which are memory representations of task-relevant (target) information. Recent studies using cued visual search tasks in combination with electrophysiological markers of visual working memory (VWM) suggest that observers initially keep the template in VWM but then rapidly offload it to long-term memory (LTM) when the target repeats. The present study uses eye-tracking to investigate if the oculomotor system can also provide useful markers of attentional learning. Participants first received a cue as to which target to look for in a subsequent search display, which was presented after an approximately one second delay. Search displays consisted of Landolt Cs with gaps in eight possible orientations. The same target was then repeated for another six trials, as was the cue indicating the target identity. After seven trials in total, observers received a new cue indicating the new target, which was then repeated again. Crucially, the cues were presented lateralized and were so small that observers had to make an eye movement to discern it. If learning leads to a shift from VWM to LTM, then it becomes unnecessary to look at the cue, predicting a reduction in cue-directed saccades. However, this is not what happened: Although a speeding of search RTs indicated learning with target repetition, saccade rates to the cue hardly decreased. Instead, repetition of the cue led to a decrease in fixation duration on the cue. Making processing of the cue more costly (using symbolic cues) or even useless (using completely uninformative cues) led at best to a moderate decrease in saccadic orienting to the cue. The results indicate that fixation duration is a more reliable marker of cue-based attentional learning than saccadic orienting is. Instead, saccadic orienting may be used to retrieve learned memories, using the cue as an "external pointer".

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.