August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Task irrelevant visual input reduces accuracy of echolocation in a size discrimination task
Author Affiliations
  • Lore Thaler
    Department of Psychology, Durham University, United Kingdom
  • Megan Cutts
    Department of Psychology, Durham University, United Kingdom
  • Denise Foresteire
    Department of Psychology, Durham University, United Kingdom
  • Alison Wilkinson
    Department of Psychology, Durham University, United Kingdom
  • Charlotte Atkin
    Department of Psychology, Durham University, United Kingdom
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/16.12.145
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lore Thaler, Megan Cutts, Denise Foresteire, Alison Wilkinson, Charlotte Atkin; Task irrelevant visual input reduces accuracy of echolocation in a size discrimination task. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):145. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.12.145.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Background: Echolocation is the ability to perceive the environment by making sonar emissions and listening to returning echoes. For people, it has been suggested that echolocation may not only draw on auditory, but also 'visual' processing (Arnott, Thaler, Milne, Kish, & Goodale, 2013; Thaler, Arnott, & Goodale, 2011; Thaler, Wilson, & Gee, 2014). Here we used an interference paradigm to further explore the interaction between vision and echolocation. Method: Blindfolded sighted echo-naive participants used mouth-click based echolocation to discriminate sizes of objects. Participants wore black-out goggles fitted with LEDs. The goggles blacked out vision of the environment at all times, but LEDs when switched on also provided task-irrelevant visual input. In a control condition, blindfolded sighted and blind participants performed the same echolocation task, whilst also wearing electrode patches, which when switched on provided task-irrelevant tactile stimulation (i.e. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation). Results: Participants' echolocation accuracy scores were significantly reduced in conditions where luminance input had been provided, as compared to conditions where it had not been provided. This drop in performance was not observed in the control condition that had used task-irrelevant tactile stimulation. Discussion: The results suggest that visual but not tactile sensory input 'interferes' with echolocation, suggesting that vision and echolocation may interact at an early sensory stage in the human brain

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×