August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Visual and Tactile Enumeration and the Effect of Numerosity Range on Enumeration
Author Affiliations
  • Zahira Cohen
    Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Israel
  • Avishai Henik
    Department of Psychology and the Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Israel
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 155. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Zahira Cohen, Avishai Henik; Visual and Tactile Enumeration and the Effect of Numerosity Range on Enumeration. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):155.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Subitizing is a fast and accurate process of enumerating small quantities. Most studies explore visual enumeration. Thus, the question is whether subitizing is a general process that occurs regardless of modality presentation. The literature on tactile subitizing is sparse and the findings are diverse. According to our knowledge, no study has compared visual and tactile modalities using as similar a methodology as possible. We used a within-participants design to compare visual and tactile enumeration using both hands, and to explore the effect of numerosity range (NR) on enumeration. In Experiment 1, using a custom-made vibro-tactile apparatus, we replicated results of Cohen, Naparstek, and Henik (2014, Acta Psychologica, 150C, 26–34) and again found a moderate increase in RT for up to 4 stimuli and then a decrease for 5 stimuli. In Experiment 2, we compared NR 1-5 and 1-10 in tactile and visual enumeration. The results showed that enumeration for NR 1-5 was faster than for NR 1-10, especially for numerosities 4 and 5. Within NR 1-10, in the visual modality the subitizing range was 4, counting ranged from 5 to 9, and there was an end effect of 10 dots. In contrast, in the tactile modality, when excluding one-hand arrangements, the subitizing range was 2, the counting range was from 3 to 5, there was an acceleration of counting from 5 and on, and there was an end effect for 10 stimuli that was stronger than for 10 visual stimuli. We suggest that NR influences enumeration and that number-hand association (i.e., resulting from finger counting) influences enumeration, resulting in (a) faster counting for large numerosities in the tactile modality and (b) a different RT pattern for each modality.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.