August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Assessing the invisibility of spatial disarray in peripheral vision
Author Affiliations
  • Matteo Valsecchi
    Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen
  • Jan Koenderink
    Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven
  • Andrea van Doorn
    Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven
  • Karl Gegenfurtner
    Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 229. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Matteo Valsecchi, Jan Koenderink, Andrea van Doorn, Karl Gegenfurtner; Assessing the invisibility of spatial disarray in peripheral vision. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):229.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

One of the defining characteristics of peripheral vision is that positional information is largely degraded. In a psychophysical experiment we investigate how positional uncertainty affects appearance within peripheral vision. To this aim we generated spatially disarrayed versions (eidolons) of natural images from the UPenn database. The disarray was determined by a random field confined to a 10° circular area within the image and was characterized by the maximum displacement which could be applied to a pixel (reach). In each trial, observers were exposed to two versions of the same image, the original image and the disarrayed eidolon in a random sequence. Each picture was shown for 1.5 s, interleaved for .5 s by a phase-scrambled image. Observers reported which image appeared disarrayed. Between trials we varied both the reach and the eccentricity of the disarrayed patch. Observers were forced to fixate either the center of the disarrayed patch, which was located left or right in the image, or at locations 10°, 20°, 30° or 40° towards the other side of the image. Accuracy in disarray identification as a function of reach was fitted through psychometric curves, yielding reach thresholds at each eccentricity. The data by six observers showed a clear linear increase in the reach thresholds as a function of eccentricity up to 30°, with average foveal reach thresholds of .143° (std .039) and slopes of .015 (std .005). Disarray detection proved much harder at 40° eccentricity, largely independent of reach. Our results show that features can be displaced to a substantial extent (over .5°) in peripheral vision, before an image loses its perceptual quality of naturalness, in accordance with the hypothesis that in peripheral vision positional information is degraded before it reaches awareness. Eidolons potentially offer a way to visualize the appearance of peripheral stimuli in foveal vision.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.