August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Category learning causes a stable advantage for category-relevant shape dimensions during a task requiring attention to all dimensions: ERP evidence
Author Affiliations
  • Michael Dieciuc
    Department of Psychology, Florida State University
  • Nelson Roque
    Department of Psychology, Florida State University
  • Jonathan Folstein
    Department of Psychology, Florida State University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 257. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michael Dieciuc, Nelson Roque, Jonathan Folstein; Category learning causes a stable advantage for category-relevant shape dimensions during a task requiring attention to all dimensions: ERP evidence. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):257.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Objects differ along a number of different dimensions (e.g., shape, color, size) but only some of these dimensions are relevant for successful categorization. Learning to categorize cars along relevant dimensions can lead to stable changes in the visual system. These changes involve stretching psychological space to make exemplars differing in relevant features more dissimilar than exemplars differing in irrelevant features. This selective stretching of psychological space along relevant dimensions is known as dimensional modulation. Here, we (1) provide further evidence that category learning causes stable dimensional modulation, observable in tasks where learned categories are irrelevant and (2) probe the time course of these effects. Participants learned to categorize morphed cars according to a relevant shape dimension while ignoring an irrelevant shape dimension. After four sessions of categorization training, EEG was recorded during a task requiring the identification of a single target car. Importantly, learned category boundaries were not relevant to this task so that participants had to attend to both relevant and irrelevant shape dimensions. The critical comparison was between two types of non-target cars: those that differed from the target along category-irrelevant dimensions and those that differed along category-relevant dimensions. If category learning caused stable dimensional modulation, then non-targets with irrelevant differences should appear more target-like than non-targets with relevant differences, eliciting more target-like ERPs. As predicted, targets elicited a larger selection negativity, a postero-lateral component sensitive to detection of target features, than non-targets and non-targets with irrelevant differences elicited a larger selection negativity than non-targets with relevant differences. Interestingly, category-relevance of perceptual differences did not modulate the P300, a later decision related component. Overall, the results suggest that category learning causes stimuli with relevant differences to be perceived as less similar than stimuli with irrelevant differences, even when attention is directed to both kinds of features.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.