August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Acquisition and persistence of location information over the time course of natural actions.
Author Affiliations
  • M Pilar Aivar
    Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
  • Chia-Ling Li
    Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, US
  • Matthew Tong
    Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, US
  • Dmitry Kit
    Department of Computer Science, University of Bath, UK
  • Mary Hayhoe
    Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, US
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 353. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M Pilar Aivar, Chia-Ling Li, Matthew Tong, Dmitry Kit, Mary Hayhoe; Acquisition and persistence of location information over the time course of natural actions.. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):353.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Previous research has shown that information that is task-relevant is retained over time and protected from posterior interference (e.g. Maxcey-Richard & Hollingworth, 2013). To examine whether location information is acquired and persists over the time course of natural actions we had participants perform a visual search task in an immersive virtual reality apartment. Participants searched the two rooms that formed the apartment for a series of geometric target objects, which were always visible. Eye movements, head movements and body trajectories were recorded. Target locations were manipulated to see if participants took advantage of regularities in the environment. Specifically, all target objects (8) were presented at the same locations in blocks 1, 2, 3 and 5, but switched location in each trial during block 4. We analyzed search time and number of errors (visits to wrong room) per block of 8 trials. Average search time decreased significantly between blocks 1 and 3 and then increased significantly in block 4. Interestingly, search time decreased again in block 5, once objects returned to their locations, with averages significantly lower than those of block 3. Room errors increased to 50% in block 4 but decreased significantly in block 5 to values similar to those of block 3. Gaze content also showed that about half of the participants used a memory-based strategy for finding the objects in block 4: on 28% of the trials these participants' first object fixation was on the object now occupying the location where the target used to be in blocks 1 to 3. From these three results we conclude that participants retained target location information from previous trials and used this information to make their search more efficient (i.e. block 5). The unreliability of object locations during block 4 was not enough to overwrite the information acquired during the first three blocks.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.