August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Feature-location binding, the "spatial congruency bias", and object-based attention
Author Affiliations
  • Marina Barboza
    Department of Psychology. The Ohio State University
  • Nonie Finlayson
    Department of Psychology. The Ohio State University
  • Xiaoli Zhang
    Department of Psychology. The Ohio State University
  • Julie Golomb
    Department of Psychology. The Ohio State University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 412. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marina Barboza, Nonie Finlayson, Xiaoli Zhang, Julie Golomb; Feature-location binding, the "spatial congruency bias", and object-based attention. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):412.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Successful visual processing involves combining information about object features and their spatial locations. Spatial attention is thought to play an important role in this binding process. However, it has been shown that attention is not only allocated to a specific spatial location (space-based attention) but can also spread across an object (object-based attention). Here we explored whether binding is sensitive to space-based or object-based effects, using a recent finding thought to reflect location binding called the spatial congruency bias (Golomb et al., 2014). The spatial congruency bias shows that when two stimuli are presented in the same location individuals perceive them as more similar in features/identity. We tested whether two stimuli are also perceived as more similar when contained within the same "object" compared to on different objects. Participants fixated at the center of a display with two rectangular frames representing two "objects" (as in Egly et al, 1994). A first stimulus (colored square) was presented on one end of one object and then masked; after a brief delay, a second stimulus was presented and masked. These two stimuli could be presented in the same exact location, a different location on the same object, or a different location on a different object. Importantly, location was irrelevant to the task, which was to judge same or different color. We replicated the spatial congruency bias such that two stimuli presented in the same location were more likely to be judged as the same color. Notably, we also found that participants were more likely to indicate that two stimuli were the same color when they were presented on the same object compared to being presented across different objects. These results suggest that both space-based and object-based effects influence the spatial congruency bias and may play a role in location binding.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.