August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Without informative cues, little can be learned to discriminate eye of origin of visual inputs after multiple weeks of training
Author Affiliations
  • Li Zhaoping
    Department of Computer Science, University College London
  • Zihao Xiao
    Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 440. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Li Zhaoping, Zihao Xiao; Without informative cues, little can be learned to discriminate eye of origin of visual inputs after multiple weeks of training. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):440.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Humans cannot discriminate eye of origin of visual input, when the informative cues such as feeling-in-the-eye are made uninformative (Ono and Barbeito, 1985), nor can they improve discrimination by one week of daily practice with feedback (Blake and Cormack, 1979). We ask whether improvement is possible by more extensive training (Zhaoping and Xiao 2015). The two authors practiced this task with feedback for multiple weeks, with occasional holiday breaks. Typically, each trial presented the observer a brief (200 ms) dichoptic test stimulus containing an array of monocular items. The observer had to report the ocular origin of the central target item, which was distinctively shaped from the other, task-irrelevant, non-target items. The ocular origin and the luminance of all the monocular items were randomly and independently assigned, and the non-target items in the two eyes were bars tilted in opposite directions from vertical. Binocular dots between monocular items were used to anchor vergence. This test stimulus was preceeded by binocular fixation stimulus and followed by a binocular mask. A random third of the trials were control trials containing no target item, prompting for a distinct response. In initial days, the target was a vertical bar. After 14-20 training days, the task performance (for non-control trials) rose consistently above the chance level to contain correct responses in 70-80% of the trials. One observer noticed, on her 31st training day, that the apparent tilt of the target was informative since it correlated with its ocular origin, perhaps caused by her astigmatism. Modifying the stimulus design to remove each confirmed or suspected informative cue often immediately dropped performance, and further training on the modified design often raised performance, revealing additional informative cues, which were then further removed. Eventually, performance could not be improved beyond 55% correct by more than two weeks of training.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.