August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
The double-drift illusion is isotropic across visual field locations and directions
Author Affiliations
  • Sirui Liu
    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
  • Patrick Cavanagh
    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/16.12.663
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sirui Liu, Patrick Cavanagh; The double-drift illusion is isotropic across visual field locations and directions. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):663. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.12.663.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

When the internal texture of a Gabor patch drifts in the orthogonal direction of the patch itself, the perceived path can deviate from its physical path by 45° or more (Tse & Hsieh, 2006; Lisi & Cavanagh, 2015). Recently, Adamian and Cavanagh (ECVP 2015) reported that the size of this double-drift illusion, when tested with an elliptical trajectory, is reduced when presented at either the vertical or horizontal meridian. In the present study, we used a Gabor patch that oscillated back and forth on a linear path, reversing its internal motion at the same time as the external motion reversed. We measured the strength of the illusion by asking subjects to add a physical tilt to the perceived path angle until the trajectory appeared to be aligned with two reference dots that were set at 45° from the initial motion axis. For a strong illusion, the path would already appear aligned with the dots and no additional physical tilt would have to be added. The weaker the illusion, the more physical tilt would have to be added to reach alignment. The physical path of the stimulus was centered at one of the eight isoeccentric peripheral locations (8° from fixation) with one of four external motion orientations (vertical, horizontal, right diagonal and left diagonal) and one of two adjusting directions (45° clockwise or counterclockwise from the initial physical path). In contrast to the previous finding, our results show that the magnitude of the motion-induced position shift of the double-drift stimulus was similar across all eight locations in the visual field for all the physical or the adjusted orientations of the motion path. Measured with a linear rather than curved path, the illusion appears to be based on its physical configuration and independent of retinal location or orientation at a given eccentricity.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×