August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Effect of prior knowledge on visual localization of tactile stimulation
Author Affiliations
  • Stephanie Badde
    Department of Psychology, New York University
  • Hyunjin Oh
    Department of Psychology, New York University
  • Michael Landy
    Department of Psychology, New York University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 1190. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Stephanie Badde, Hyunjin Oh, Michael Landy; Effect of prior knowledge on visual localization of tactile stimulation. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):1190.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The ability to localize tactile stimuli on the skin varies with stimulus properties (e.g., strength). We tested whether humans systematically incorporate stimulus properties and prior knowledge when localizing tactile stimuli relative to a visual reference. On each trial, a stimulator in one of five horizontally aligned locations (10 mm spacing) gently buzzed the back of the right hand. Stimulators were hidden from view by a white foam block. Participants fixated a mark projected onto the block (horizontally centered on the right hand, vertically aligned with the stimulators). Consequently, participants received constant visual feedback about the hand's position and shape, features typically misestimated in the absence of vision. After each tactile stimulus a different "ruler" (horizontal row of 5 mm wide colored patterns) was projected onto the block at the height of the stimulators. Participants indicated the perceived location of the stimulus by selecting a pattern. We are interested in localization bias, so no feedback was given. In separate sessions, the stimulator locations were distributed around the center, left or right side of the hand; the fixation mark was always projected on the center of the hand. In two practice blocks, the session-specific spatial distribution of stimulation was learned at the beginning of each session. Two strengths of vibrotactile stimulation were used, chosen randomly. Participants showed a localization bias towards the center of the locations tested in each session. This bias was much stronger for the weaker stimulus strength. There was an additional bias toward the center of the hand (i.e., the fixation mark). Performance was consistent with a Bayesian model of localization combining a prior expectation based on the distribution of stimuli in a session with a likelihood whose variance depended on stimulus strength as well as a bias towards center of the hand (visual fixation).

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.