August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Perceptual Inferences in Schizophrenia: A preliminary study in healthy participants
Author Affiliations
  • Pantelis Leptourgos
    Group for Neural Theory, DEC, ENS, Paris, France
  • Charles-Edouard Notredame
    SCALab, Lille University, Lille, France
  • Renaud Jardri
    Group for Neural Theory, DEC, ENS, Paris, France
  • Sophie Deneve
    Group for Neural Theory, DEC, ENS, Paris, France
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 1220. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Pantelis Leptourgos, Charles-Edouard Notredame, Renaud Jardri, Sophie Deneve; Perceptual Inferences in Schizophrenia: A preliminary study in healthy participants. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):1220.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

It has been suggested that aberrant inferences (circular inferences) implemented in brain networks, generating a system that overweights even weak sensory evidence could underlie the positive dimension of schizophrenia (Jardri and Denève, 2013). This hypothesis was validated by a probabilistic reasoning task (in prep.). Here we validate, with a pilot study in healthy subjects, a paradigm that allows for experimentally testing the respective impacts of sensory evidence and priors on perception in schizophrenia. Necker Cube is an ambiguous figure, known to induce bistability. Such figures were continuously presented to 50 participants during 15 consecutive runs. We manipulated sensory evidence by adding shades to the stimuli (3 last runs) and prior expectations by giving different instructions to 3 different groups (15 – 15 – 20 participants), concerning the presence of an implicit preference. Participants' responses were discretely and pseudo-regularly collected (Mamassian and Goutcher, 2005). After confirming the existence of an implicit prior (p< 0.001), we showed that manipulation of this prior had significant opposite effects (p=0.009), either by exacerbating or cancelling the intrinsic bias of the system. The effect of sensory evidence was even stronger (p< 0.001), and induced a significant bias corresponding to the direction of the cue. This effect was so strong that it overcame the impact of the instructions when cues and prior manipulations were combined. We also found that the behavior could be well fitted by Bayesian models ("simple" Bayes, model with Markovian statistics) with low statistical dependencies between successive time steps. This study will be used as a reference, in order to study patients with psychotic symptoms and test our initial claim.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.