August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Eye abduction reduces competition in the oculomotor system
Author Affiliations
  • Paul Boon
    Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Jan Theeuwes
    Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Artem Belopolsky
    Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 1265. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Paul Boon, Jan Theeuwes, Artem Belopolsky; Eye abduction reduces competition in the oculomotor system. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):1265.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

It is well established that there is a tight coupling between covert attention and the eye movement system. It is not yet clear whether there is a functional relationship between the two systems. Recent studies using the Posner cueing paradigm have demonstrated that preventing participants from executing a saccade reduces the attentional benefits associated with allocation of covert attention. One such technique involves abducting the eye in the orbit and presenting the stimuli outside of the effective oculomotor range (Craighero et al., 2004). In the present study we used saccadic curvature to examine whether eye abduction also reduces the competition in the oculomotor system. Saccadic curvature arises from competition within the oculomotor map when a visual distractor competes with the target. Typically, this causes saccades to curve away from the distractor. We experimentally reduced the ability to execute saccades by abducting the eye 30° into the temporal hemifield (monocular vision). This way the peripheral part of the temporal hemifield was located outside of the oculomotor range. Participants made a vertical eye movement while on some trials a distractor was shown either at a close or remote location in one of the hemifields. The results showed a decrease in curvature away from distractors located outside the oculomotor range. However, no such decrease was observed in the nasal hemifield, where saccade planning was unaffected. The results demonstrate that the inability to plan a saccade results in a decrease of distractor evoked activity in the oculomotor system even when the retinal stimulation is kept the same. The results are consistent with the premotor theory, which proposes that attention has emerged as an unavoidable consequence of movement planning.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.