August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Attention field models capture biases in perceived position
Author Affiliations
  • Barrie Klein
    Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University
  • Chris Paffen
    Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University
  • Susan te Pas
    Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University
  • Serge Dumoulin
    Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 1273. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Barrie Klein, Chris Paffen, Susan te Pas, Serge Dumoulin; Attention field models capture biases in perceived position. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):1273.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Attention is the mechanism through which we are able to select relevant information from our visual environment. Attention field models describe the effects of attention on neural processing and predict that receptive fields are attracted towards the attended location. We have recently demonstrated this attraction using fMRI and found that the amount of attraction varies across the visual hierarchy (Klein et al, Neuron, 2014). Here, we apply an attention field model to human perception: we predict that receptive field attraction results in a bias in perceived position, which depends on the size of the underlying receptive fields. Participants were presented with two pairs of Gabors and judged which of the two pairs was spaced closest together. Attention was directed to one of the pairs using exogenous cues. In two experiments we varied (1) the eccentric position and (2) the spatial frequency of the Gabors. As receptive field size increases with increasing eccentricity and decreasing spatial frequency, we expect a larger bias in the perceived position for higher eccentricities on the hand and lower spatial frequencies on the other. Our results show that the positional bias increased with eccentricity, but did not vary with spatial frequency. We also found that the increase of the positional bias with eccentricity closely matches the predictions derived from an attention field model. We conducted control experiments to exclude possible alternative explanations and to control for confounds. In conclusion, attention field models can account for some positional biases, but do not account for the spatial frequency manipulation. We speculate that the attention field as elicited by our cues operates in visual space but not in the frequency domain. Our results suggest that attention field models provide a useful framework to understand effects of attention on human perception.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.