August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Crowding and grouping in letter recognition
Author Affiliations
  • Deyue Yu
    College of Optometry, Ohio State University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 1416. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Deyue Yu; Crowding and grouping in letter recognition. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):1416.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Crowding can increase or decrease with additional flankers, depending on the grouping among stimulus components. Here, we examined how letter crowding changes with increasing number of flanking letters, and whether the change is modulated by letter complexity. In the experiment, stimuli were letter strings constructed using lowercase Courier font with a print size of 1° and a spacing of 1.16 × x-width. Identification accuracy was measured for the middle target letter which was flanked by either two or four flankers and presented at 10° to the left or right of fixation. Flankers were always duplicate letters, and either identical to or different from the target letter. There were a total of 676 target-flanker combinations plus 26 isolated letters. Identification accuracy was nearly perfect (0.98) for isolated letters. When increasing the number of flankers from two to four, no change in performance (0.68 vs. 0.75) was observed for identical target-flanker condition. For the non-identical condition, identification accuracy was lower for pentagrams (0.44) than for trigrams (0.55). Analysis of the error trials revealed that the deterioration resides in mislocation rather than crowding. There were more mislocation errors in pentagrams (0.24) than in trigrams (0.16). Linear regressions were performed to assess the effect of letter complexity. We found that higher flanker complexity led to worse performance while higher-complexity targets made identification easier. Specifically, more complex flankers induced greater crowding and more mislocation errors. Higher target complexity was associated with lower mislocation rates, and corresponded to less increase or even reduction in mislocation errors when doubling flankers. Our findings demonstrate that the letter crowding or the effect of grouping among stimulus components does not change with number of flankers. However, additional flankers do lead to more letter substitution, which is modulated by target letter complexity.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.