August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
A new vocabulary for understanding limits on perception
Author Affiliations
  • Chris Sims
    Department of Psychology, Drexel University
  • Rachel Lerch
    Department of Psychology, Drexel University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 1435. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chris Sims, Rachel Lerch; A new vocabulary for understanding limits on perception. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):1435.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Human perceptual processing, like any physical information channel, is by necessity capacity-limited. However, limits on channel capacity are only one factor that is relevant for understanding what makes for an 'optimal' or 'efficient' communication system. Perceptual systems exist not merely to transmit information, but rather to allow organisms to accomplish behavioral goals. Hence, an optimal perceptual system is one that minimizes the task-relevant costs of perceptual error (defined by a particular cost function) subject to a limit on capacity. The mathematical field of rate–distortion theory provides the theoretical tools necessary for studying this problem. Importantly, in this framework the optimality of a given perceptual system depends critically on three factors: (1) limits on capacity, (2) limits on statistical learning, and (3) the match between the implicit and explicit cost function for a given task. Research on visual perception and visual memory has focused almost exclusively on understanding capacity or resource limits, while the latter two constructs have been largely overlooked. Hence, rate–distortion theory provides a much richer vocabulary for understanding perceptual processing, and yields novel and unique predictions for human performance. We applied this framework to two benchmark domains in the study of perception: the discrete categorization of perceptual signals (also known as absolute identification) and perceptual working memory. In each case rate–distortion theory provides a quantitative fit to the data that is better than or comparable to the best published models in the literature. We argue that human perceptual performance is explained by three equally important factors, not just limits on capacity. Perceptual processing must also be understood in terms of the implicit cost function it seeks to minimize, as well as limits in implicit statistical learning.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.