September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
The impact of mnemonic interference on memory for visual form
Author Affiliations
  • Aedan Li
    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
  • Celia Fidalgo
    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
  • Andy Lee
    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
    Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest
  • Morgan Barense
    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
    Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 96. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Aedan Li, Celia Fidalgo, Andy Lee, Morgan Barense; The impact of mnemonic interference on memory for visual form. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):96. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

How does interference impact memory? Previous work found that different types of distracting information can differentially alter how visual representations are forgotten. In addition, a recent series of experiments found that highly dissimilar interfering items erase the contents of memory, while highly similar and variable interfering items blur memory representations. Though these effects have been shown for color memory, it is unclear if they extend to other object features such as shape. Here, we used a novel "Shape Wheel" to assess how different kinds of interference would impact shape memory. On this wheel, 2D line drawings were morphed together to create an array of 360 shapes, corresponding to 360 degrees on a circle. Participants were asked to remember a shape sampled from this wheel, then were shown interfering shapes that were either perceptually similar to the studied shape, perceptually dissimilar from the studied shape, perceptually variable, or scrambled shapes (baseline condition). We used a mixture model to measure the probability that the item is stored in memory, defined as accuracy, as well as the level of detail of that representation, defined as precision. We found that when interfering shapes were similar to the studied item, a numerical but non-significant benefit to memory accuracy was observed. However, when interfering shapes were dissimilar to the studied item, accuracy was reduced. In contrast, memory precision was reduced only when interfering shapes were similar or perceptually variable. These findings extend previous results by demonstrating the differential effects of interference for isolated feature-level shape information. Visually dissimilar interference erases memory representations, while visually variable and highly similar interfering items tended to blur shape representations. As the impact of interference was consistent across studies, these findings may offer a set of general principles regarding how interference impacts high-level object representations and all features therein.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.