September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Working Memory Capacity and Cognitive Filtering Predict Demand Avoidance.
Author Affiliations
  • Jeff Nador
    Wright State University
  • Brad Minnery
    Wright State Research Institute
  • Matt Sherwood
    Wright State Research Institute
  • Assaf Harel
    Wright State University
  • Ion Juvina
    Wright State University
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 106. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jeff Nador, Brad Minnery, Matt Sherwood, Assaf Harel, Ion Juvina; Working Memory Capacity and Cognitive Filtering Predict Demand Avoidance.. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):106.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

In general, optimization of task performance minimizes cognitive demand. For example, when participants can choose freely between task variants, they tend to select the one that minimizes cognitive demand (Kool et al., 2010). Here, we test whether the ability to filter irrelevant information during task performance will reduce cognitive processing demands. Previous research has shown that observers with higher visual working memory (VWM) capacity tend to be more efficient cognitive filterers (Vogel, McCollough & Machizawa, 2005). Consequently, we hypothesize that such demand avoidance arises from individual differences in VWM capacity. To test this hypothesis, we collected psychophysical and electrophysiological measures of VWM capacity and cognitive filtering in a sample of 22 observers. We then correlated these with independent psychophysical measures of demand avoidance. We found that observers with higher VWM capacity tended to select the less demanding of two task alternatives, and that this occurred because filtering irrelevant information increased their sensitivity to our covert demand manipulation. Moreover, reaction times increased significantly when a given trial's instructions switched with respect to the preceding trial's, and this increase tended to be larger among those with greater cognitive filtering ability. Taken together, our results suggest that working memory capacity and cognitive filtering ability contribute to individual differences in demand avoidance. Inefficient cognitive filterers tend to process more irrelevant information and are therefore less sensitive to covert variations in demand. Efficient filterers, on the other hand, can successfully ignore irrelevant information, and are therefore more sensitive. As such, we surmise that individual differences in visual working memory capacity and cognitive filtering predict demand avoidance.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.