September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Suppressive mechanism in motion perception correlates with postural control ability
Author Affiliations
  • Liana Saftari
    Department of Human Factors Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan, South Korea
  • Shuping Xiong
    Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea
  • Oh-Sang Kwon
    Department of Human Factors Engineering, UNIST, Ulsan, South Korea
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/17.10.363
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Liana Saftari, Shuping Xiong, Oh-Sang Kwon; Suppressive mechanism in motion perception correlates with postural control ability. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):363. https://doi.org/10.1167/17.10.363.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Motivation: To properly control postural balance, good coordination between visual, vestibular and muscle control system must be maintained. It has been documented that deteriorated visual abilities such as visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and depth perception are related to the deficits in postural control. However, little attention has been paid to the relation between motion detection sensitivity and postural control, which is an important gap in literature because motion signal is crucial in maintaining balance. Methods: Twenty older (67-78) and twenty young adults (19-24) underwent series of tasks measuring visual and postural control abilities. Visual tasks include visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, depth perception and motion sensitivity tasks. Motion sensitivity was determined by measuring duration thresholds in two sizes and two contrasts conditions. Postural control tasks include maintaining upright stance in different combination of visual aid and floor conditions, and shifting the center of mass to certain location without stepping out from initial position. Results: We replicated existing findings that contrast sensitivity and visual acuity are related to the ability of shifting center of mass accurately (P< 0.01, r=0.523 and P< 0.01, r=0.526 respectively). More importantly, we found that motion sensitivities to different size of stimulus are related to different abilities of balance control. Sensitivity to large motion stimulus is negatively correlated with the ability of maintaining upright stance (P< 0.001, r=-0.540), and sensitivity to small motion stimulus is positively correlated with the ability of shifting center of mass accurately (P< 0.001, r=0.670). Discussion: The improvement of perceptual sensitivity to a large-high contrast motion in older adults indicates that deteriorated ability of suppressing irrelevant motion signals. Our current finding that the size of motion stimulus affects the correlation between motion perception and balancing differently suggests that suppression of irrelevant peripheral motion signal might have critical role in controlling balance.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×