September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Cortical distance determines the perceptual outcomes of crowding
Author Affiliations
  • John Greenwood
    Experimental Psychology, University College London
  • Joseph Danter
    Experimental Psychology, University College London
  • Rhiannon Finnie
    Experimental Psychology, University College London
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 398. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      John Greenwood, Joseph Danter, Rhiannon Finnie; Cortical distance determines the perceptual outcomes of crowding. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):398.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

In peripheral vision, object recognition is disrupted by clutter. This crowding effect typically causes target and flanker objects to appear more alike (assimilation). However, tilt contrast effects also increase in peripheral vision, causing target and flanker objects to appear more dissimilar (repulsion). Although repulsion dominates in the parafovea with large target-flanker separations, assimilation increases with higher eccentricities and/or smaller separations (Mareschal, Morgan & Solomon, 2010). The common factor has been argued to be cortical distance: assimilation occurs when flankers are close to the target within retinotopic maps, while flankers at greater distances induce repulsion. Here we test this proposal with two psychophysical manipulations that dissociate cortical and physical distance. Observers (n=8) judged the orientation of a target Gabor (clockwise/counter-clockwise of vertical), flanked by two Gabors oriented either clockwise or counter-clockwise of vertical. We first manipulate cortical distance via the arrangement of target-flanker elements: because cortical magnification is higher along the radial dimension (extending from fixation), radially-positioned flankers will be cortically closer to the target than tangential/iso-eccentric flankers. Accordingly, we observe far more assimilation errors with radial flankers, while tangential flankers predominantly induce repulsion errors. We next manipulate cortical distance by presenting stimuli in the upper and lower visual fields. Because the upper-field representation is compressed (Fortenbaugh, Silver & Robertson, 2015), target-flanker separations will be effectively reduced relative to the lower field. Accordingly, for stimuli with the same physical eccentricity and target-flanker separation, we observe far greater assimilation in the upper than the lower visual field. Individual differences in visual-field size are also correlated with these assimilation rates. Our results suggest that cortical distance is a key determinant of the perceptual outcomes of crowding. By combining models of crowding and tilt contrast, we suggest that the compulsory pooling of orientation-selective population responses can provide a common mechanism for these effects.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.