September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
How does representation of faces change with increasing familiarity?
Author Affiliations
  • Mintao Zhao
    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
  • Duangkamol Srismith
    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
  • Isabelle Bülthoff
    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 616. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mintao Zhao, Duangkamol Srismith, Isabelle Bülthoff; How does representation of faces change with increasing familiarity?. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):616.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

It is well established that familiar and unfamiliar faces are processed differently, in terms of both behavioural and neural responses. Although these differences indicate that representation of faces changes when faces become more and more familiar, how familiar and unfamiliar faces are represented in memory and how increasing familiarity changes face representation remain unclear. Here we investigated how faces are represented when participants saw them for the first time (i.e., unfamiliar faces), when participants had developed visual familiarity with them (i.e., visually familiar faces), and when participants knew the faces very well (i.e., personally familiar faces). Participants were shown an array of facial morphs varying from highly anti-caricatured (-50%) to highly caricatured (+50%), and were asked to select one matching the original face of the person best. The results showed that, for unfamiliar faces, participants' response frequency was highest for the highly anti-caricatured faces (-50%), and decreased when faces became more and more caricatured. For personally familiar faces, participants selected the original faces most often, and the further away a facial morph was from the original face, the less likely it was selected. Responses to visually familiar faces differed from responses to both unfamiliar and very familiar faces and can be described as a transition between them. These results indicate that unfamiliar faces are initially represented with a bias towards the facial norm, whereas personally familiar faces are represented veridically. Importantly, these data demonstrate that face representation shifts in face space with increasing familiarity. The more familiar a face is, the more its corresponding representation shifts from a location near the facial norm (i.e. anti-caricatured) to its veridical location in face space.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.