September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
The Density Effect in Centroid Computation
Author Affiliations
  • Jordan Rashid
    University of California, Irvine
  • Charles Chubb
    University of California, Irvine
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 782. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jordan Rashid, Charles Chubb; The Density Effect in Centroid Computation. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):782. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Human vision is highly efficient in estimating the centroids of spatially scattered items. However, the computations underlying this remarkable skill remain poorly understood. A salient fact is that in estimating the centroids of dot-clouds, observers underweight densely packed dots relative to isolated dots (Mooreland & Boynton, 2016). A simple theory of this effect proposes that the centroid estimation process operates not directly on the input stimulus but rather on a version of the stimulus that has been preprocessed by (1) a low-pass filter followed by (2) a compressive nonlinearity. This model predicts that closely adjacent dots of opposite contrast polarity should exert very little weight in centroid estimates compared to dots of the same polarity. We tested this prediction in a centroid task using brief (150 ms) clouds that mixed 9 white and 9 black dots on a gray background. On each trial the observer strove to mouse-click the centroid of the stimulus cloud weighting all dots equally. Data were well described by a model that allowed the weight exerted on the subject's response by a given dot to depend on the peripherality of the dot in the stimulus cloud as well as on the density of same-polarity and opposite-polarity dots surrounding the dot. Density (orthogonalized relative to peripherality) exerted a large influence, modulating the weight exerted by stimulus dots on the order of ± 50% for most observers. Contrary to the predictions of the simple theory above, closely adjacent dots of opposite vs. the same polarity exerted equal influence on centroid estimates. A simple explanation of our results is that dot contrasts are rectified before the linear filter is applied. This could be accomplished as follows: (1) add together the responses of on-cells and off-cells, (2) low-pass filter the result, and (3) apply a compressive nonlinearity.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.