September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Expecting the unexpected: expecting to be surprised reduces attribute amnesia
Author Affiliations
  • Hui Chen
    Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University
  • Brad Wyble
    Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University
  • Baruch Eitam
    Department of Psychology, University of Haifa
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 872. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hui Chen, Brad Wyble, Baruch Eitam; Expecting the unexpected: expecting to be surprised reduces attribute amnesia. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):872. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Recently we reported a counterintuitive phenomenon, termed attribute amnesia, in which participants failed to report a just-attended attribute (e.g., color or identity of a letter) in a surprise test (Chen & Wyble, 2015, 2016, Chen, Swan, & Wyble, 2016; Eitam, Yeshurun, & Hassan, 2013). Despite being unable to report the attended attribute on the surprise trial, participants could correctly report the same attribute on the first control trial (directly after the surprise trial) wherein their expectation had changed so that they now expected to have to report that attribute. These findings suggest that expectation plays a critical role in determining the reportability of attended information. Here we ask whether an expectation change would improve memory performance for only the attribute that had been unexpectedly probed by the surprise question (i.e. specific improvement hypothesis), or alternatively, would the change improve reportability of all attributes of that target object (i.e. general improvement hypothesis). To distinguish between these two possibilities we used a double-surprise test paradigm, wherein participants were probed on two different attributes of a target in two separate surprise questions. The results showed that once participants were unexpectedly probed about an attribute, their memory performance on the 2nd surprise question was improved on other attributes of the target. This was true even when 15 trials elapsed between the 1st surprise test and the 2nd. These results support the general improvement hypothesis and show that when expectations about information (ir)relevance are violated within a task, participants "broaden" their set to include multiple attributes of the object, rather than just the queried attribute. This change in strategy endured for at least several minutes.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.