September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Saccade-contingent feedback improves eye movement efficiency
Author Affiliations
  • Preeti Verghese
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Insitute
  • Saeideh Ghahghaei
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Insitute
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 906. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Preeti Verghese, Saeideh Ghahghaei; Saccade-contingent feedback improves eye movement efficiency. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):906.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

We have shown previously that when observers have to find multiple targets in a limited time, immediate feedback following each saccade leads to efficient saccades (Verghese & Ghahghaei, 2013). Here we examine whether feedback is as effective when it occurs at the end of the trial, rather than after each saccade. Observers actively searched a display with six disks that each had an independent probability of being a target, so the number of targets in a trial ranged from 0 to 6. The probability of the target was set to 0.33, 0.5 or 6.7 in separate blocks. The luminance of each disk was drawn randomly from a Gaussian distribution for target and distractor luminance. Due to the overlap of these distributions, it was uncertain whether a luminance value in the overlap zone came from the target or distractor distribution. Because there was insufficient time to inspect all locations, selecting uncertain locations was much more informative than selecting locations most likely to have the target. As an incentive to explore uncertain locations, a saccade to a disk with luminance in the overlap zone generated feedback by switching the disk luminance to the mean value of the "true" distribution. The feedback occurred either immediately after the saccade, or at the end of the 900 ms trial, and lasted 200 ms. Six observers participated in the experiment, with separate sessions of delayed and immediate feedback, in counterbalanced order. Observers made more efficient saccades in sessions where feedback occurred immediately after a saccade, compared to delayed feedback at the end of the trial, particularly when target probability was high and multiple targets were more frequent. Accuracy was also higher in sessions with immediate feedback. These findings indicate that saccade-contingent feedback is very effective in increasing the efficiency of eye movements in visual search.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.