September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Effective task-switching behaviour despite fatigue by sleep restriction.
Author Affiliations
  • Gemma Hanson
    Psychology, University of Southampton, UK
  • Anne Hillstrom
    Psychology, University of Southampton, UK
  • Tamaryn Menneer
    Psychology, University of Southampton, UK
  • Dominic Taunton
    Southampton Marine and Maritime Institute, University of Southampton, UK
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 970. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gemma Hanson, Anne Hillstrom, Tamaryn Menneer, Dominic Taunton; Effective task-switching behaviour despite fatigue by sleep restriction.. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):970. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Sleep deprivation or restriction produces a tendency to conduct more exploratory behaviour (Aston-Jones & Cohen, 2005), in which there is a willingness to try new strategies (Glass et al., 2009). Voluntary task-switching strategies identified by Payne et al (2007) might therefore differ between sleep-deprived individuals and controls. Restricting sleep to 4 hours per night causes accelerated deterioration of performance (McCauley et al, 2009) with multi-tasking performance being affected after 3-5 nights (Haavisto et al, 2010). In the current study, task-switching behaviour was compared across participants whose sleep was restricted to 4 hours per night for 3 nights and participants who maintained their usual sleep pattern. The same task-switching paradigm as used by Payne et al (2007) is used, in which participants are presented with two sets of seven letters from which they are asked to generate as many words as possible. Only one set of letters is visible at a given time, and participants could freely switch between the two. Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (Åkerstedt & Gillberg, 1990) ratings were higher for the sleep-restricted than the control group. Results showed no difference between the control and sleep-restricted conditions for the number of switches made, for the number of errors made, for the types of errors made, and for the giving-up time (the time between the last word generated and the participant deciding to switch to the other task) (ηP2 = .001 to .046, power = .029 to .053). A possible reason for these null results is that sleep loss impairs some aspects of cognition more than others (Killgore 2015) and the effect of fatigue on task switching does not have any impact when the task switching is voluntary, rather the effect appears when the individual is forced to switch tasks after sleep restriction (Couyoumdjian et al. 2010).

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.